March 2015

Teachers around the country are getting shortchanged on their retirement benefits.

In this working paper, Fitzpatrick finds evidence that public sectors workers undervalue their pension benefits relative to the cost of providing them. In response to a 1998 surplus in pension fund assets, Illinois allowed late-career public school teachers to buy upgraded, more generous retirement benefits. However, on average, teachers were willing to pay just 20 cents of their current compensation for a dollar of future retirement benefits; hence, these teachers preferred current wages over pension wealth by a factor of five-to-one.

Politicians and advocates for pensions argue that they boost increase worker retention, and that enhancements to pension plans will further boost retention. This working paper from the Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER), however, could not find any evidence that this theory played out after St. Louis enacted a large pension enhancement for public school teachers. In 1999, the St. Louis teacher pension plan boosted benefits with an immediate 60 percent increase in pension wealth for all workers.
The pension "crisis" is in the eye of the beholder, but teachers are paying the ultimate costs of our current system through lower base salaries and poor retirement security
Illinois allowed union officials to participate in the state teacher pension system by teaching for a single day. Meanwhile, Illinois teachers must serve 10 years to qualify for a minimum pension.
Nationwide, there are 3.3 million public school teachers. Yet, current policies curtail the retirement security of this major class of workers.
A simple explanation for what's going on with Illinois' pensions.
Late-career teachers need to retire at a specific year in order to reach peak lifetime benefits.
By some measures the current stock market is as expensive as it has ever been. What does that mean for pension plans?